Did you see...

Resize Software – A Retrospective

First off, let me be candid. The thing that prompted this review…well, I got miffed. It started with my not being able to use my Perfect Resize 7 in CS6. I had to close CS6, open CS5, open the image, resize it, save it, close CS5, open CS6…I’m used to working in CS6 now, and CS5 feels wrong somehow. Anyway, it was getting a little old. So, I wondered, is there a new version of Perfect Resize that I can upgrade to that will work in CS6? Well, actually, no, there’s not. I have the OnOne Perfect Photo Suite 5.5; the Perfect Resize included is version 7.

There is a new Photo Suite, version 6, but the Perfect Resize is still V. 7. Over time, I’ve found I rarely, if ever, use the Photo Suite, except for Perfect Resize (PR[i]). Since it’s in the Suite however, I’d still have to pay $70 (they do honor the upgrade price from the suite to the individual software, plus for them) for the exact same version. For that amount of money, I’ll continue to open CS5 thanks so much. Anyway, although I understand the logic behind the whole thing, I still think if a bit of software is the exact same version, the company should just give you an upgrade. I know; it’s the unreasonable rebel in me. I started thinking ahead, to the next version of Photoshop (PS), when I wouldn’t want CS5 on my system anymore. What was I going to do then? Well, I could, of course, just buy a new copy of PR, either now, or perhaps try to anticipate when the new version of PS would be released and hopefully still get the upgrade price. Or I could see what’s out there besides PR. This is radical thinking for me. I’ve been a Perfect Resize junkie since PR was Genuine Fractals and OnOne was an itty bitty baby company! I didn’t even know what was out there to compete!

Unsurprisingly, there are quite a few competitors out there to check out. I initially decided on the “big two”, OnOne’s PR, of course, Alien Skin’s[ii]  Blow Up 3 (BU), and also the resizing engine inside PS, for good measure. A late entry to the race was a little known (speaking for myself) offering from BenVista Ltd.[iii] called PhotoZoom (PZ). I decided to keep it to these few for the sake of time and space with an eye towards later, perhaps, extending it by a few more examples, including some of the free offerings out there.

Test One – The Little Puppy

 

My first sample is a small, low resolution image (2.5 x 2.75 inches, 72 ppi.).Now, I’m not advocating going online, grabbing low rez images and blowing them up for your use. That’s stealing, unless you have permission, so please don’t. That being said, I’ve had people bring me copies of family images given to them by other family members, perhaps from a long distance away who didn’t know how to use a scanner, perhaps from a long time ago, that were small and low resolution, though not usually that low,  who wanted a larger copy, occasionally somewhat unreasonably larger. Moral of the story, these things happen. (By the way, anyone who’s seen my Facebook icon or my Corgi, Harleigh, knows this is my image.)

More:  Looking At: SiteGrinder 3

I ran the first batch of enlargements at 200%, with no setting changed from the defaults.

They all look pretty good, it’s only 200% after all, and they’d better!

Next up is 400%[iv].

They’re still looking good, although I see some more sharpening on the BU & PR samples, especially around the nose and eyes. This is very slight, mind you, and may be mostly caused by my staring at the images too long.

The final size for this image is 600%.

In this set, PR sharpening has gone to a place I don’t love. I call this sort of look “icey” or “chinkly” – both technical terms, mind you. Ok, they’re actually ways to say what I don’t know how to say, but I know I don’t care for it. Some people do, though, so to each their own. I’d rather my sharpening was less “chinkly” and more smooth. Usually when enlarging, though, smooth means softer, or blurrier, which is where PS is starting to go. Landing in the middle are BU and PZ, with BU being a tad more on the sharp side and PZ on the soft side. These two are my picks for the winners of this contest, with each one having defiant pros and cons, for instance, the nose on BU is a little darker, with PZ retaining a bit more detail, while BU keeps things like the whiskers sharp. They’re a bit pixelated on PZ.

Test Two – The Tiny Grandfather

 

This test is on an even smaller photo, 1.5 x 2 inches, but scanned at a higher resolution, 300ppi. I wanted to include an old photo, because that’s what I really care about. There may be other criteria for photographers, but my main objective when enlarging an old image is to keep it as crisp and clear as I can. It’s okay if I need to go back and sharpen it up, a little, with HDR Toning, but I need it to stay nice and clear.

More:  Ten Things Beginners Should Know in Photoshop

This time, I started at a 400% enlargement.

These all look pretty good, with PR looking the sharpest, tending the tiniest bit towards “chinkliness”, and PS, the softest. Next I went all the way to 1000%. No messing around, here!

I was a little surprised at how well all four handled this one! Again, PR tended a little more to the chinkly sharpness and PS was softer and blurrier. PZ was also fairly soft, though with a decent sharpness around the edges. BU had a little less softness than PS and PZ and less sharpness than PR. I think BU won this one by a slight margin.

Again, I was a little taken aback by how well all the products handled these tests. If any  were better, or worse, it was by the slightest margins, and, I have to say, completely up to the preference of the viewer. I know which looked better to me and worked better for my needs, but you may feel very differently! Since the results  were so close, I decided to  do one more little test.

Test Three – U.I., U.I., Oh

 

Is user interface important to you? Can it be the deciding factor when performance is too close to call? I think it can be a factor, especially if you can’t figure out how to use software, or if one has some really cool feature that you’ll really use that others don’t.

First, the old, familiar Photoshop Image interface.

Well, that was special! What can I say? It is what it is. It has six basic resize methods and areas for changing pixel dimensions and document sizes. In the con column, the PS resize engine is it tends towards soft and blurred. Be sure to try all the resize methods to see if any work better than the others for you. The pro is that it’s free and already installed. Again, it is what it is.

Next the Perfect Resize interface.

I’m used to the PR U.I., so I like it. It gives you a lot of options over and above the ability to change pixel dimensions and document size, like texture control, sharpening and film grain. What I really like in the PR U.I. is how it’ll prepare an image for gallery wrap printing. Cons of PR? Well, my initial gripe of not allowing a free upgrade for the same version notwithstanding, I’d say that it was still a darn good program! In my tests though, this being my own opinion, it came in third, so maybe not the software for me, after all. Upgrades on both the standard version and Pro is $69.95, otherwise, standard is $99.95 and Pro is $199.95. Pro is what was used in this test, in case you’re wondering.

More:  Photoshop an Ink Drop Video Logo Effect

Next up, Blow Up 3.

As U.I.’s go, this one’s pretty basic and clean. It’s fairly easy to figure out and it allows you to choose which output medium you’re enlarging for, like the web, or what type of paper you’ll be printing to, and also the quality, low, medium or high. It’s another way of giving you presets, but I like the options. It also has sliders for fine tuning the sharpening and film grain. Cons? Maybe that BU doesn’t have quite as many bells and whistles as PR, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. Pros? AlienSkin will upgrade your software when a new version of Photoshop comes out. How nice is that? There’s no standard / pro version, only one and it rings in at $ 199. Blow up ranked in the top two for me, with a slight edge over Perfect Resize.

And finally, PhotoZoom.

 

Ok, I have to tell you, this one I love! The U.I. is easy to figure out, it has a LOT of presets to choose from and on top of that, they really work, so be sure to try all of them! It takes up the whole screen, so you can really up the zoom on your image to see what’s going on. Cons? I haven’t really found one yet, except that maybe the cost of the Pro version is $219. It’s completely worth it, though, I think, for all the presets and features. Some presets are available in the $99 Classic version, of course, but not nearly as many. On the plus side, well, it does a really nice job!

PhotoZoom and BlowUp were the top two across the board, for me. Each have their strengths and weaknesses, but both are wonderful at what they do. Keep in mind, these tests weren’t long term using many images. I’ll be using both PZ and BU in my every day work on the same images for a little while, yet, to see if I come up with a really clear winner.

 


[i] Image tag legend: BU: Alien Skin Blow Up 3, PR: OnOne Software Perfect Resize 7, PS: Photoshop Image menu > Image Size (Alt + Ctrl + I [PC], Opt + Cmd + I [Mac]), PZ, BenVista Ltd PhotoZoom Pro

[ii] User license was provided by this company for the purposes of this review.

[iii] User license was provided by this company for the purposes of this review.

[iv] The image was enlarged from its original size every time.

About Janine Smith (114 Articles)
Janine Smith is the owner of Landailyn Research and Restoration, a Fort Worth, Texas based company whose services include family history research and photo restoration. Janine honed her skills in restoring badly damaged photos as a volunteer with Operation Photo Rescue, a non-profit organization whose mission is to repair photographs damaged by unforeseen circumstances such as house fires and natural disasters. <br> Janine’s work is well-known in the world of genealogical and historical societies, museums, libraries, university archives, and non-profit organizations; appearing on the board of directors for several organizations and institutions. She is a sought-after lecturer on photo restoration and preservation to libraries, genealogical and historical societies. <br> In addition to being a Lynda.com author, Janine is the author of many articles on research and restoration appearing in newspapers and magazines, both on and offline. Janine's history and photo restoration columns appear regularly on TipSquirrel.com and in the popular Shades Of The Departed Digital Magazine. <br> Janine is the winner of the 2010 “Photoshop User Award” in the photo-restoration category.

9 Comments on Resize Software – A Retrospective

  1. Great comparision Janine. How do you think they compare for enlarging things like screenshots?

  2. I’m thinking screenshots would turn out much the same as the 72ppi image, since most screen grabs will be at that resolution and you’ll only be able to enlarge them so much before they look bad. After all, that’s why we should only put our images up at a low resolution, to protect them because no software is going to enlarge a low rez image into a nice, sharp, pristine, ready to frame image! Well, I shouldn’t say that – who knows what the future will bring?

  3. Hi, there: I found your blog post while looking for someone to help me with an image / Alien Skin. I have an image (72dpi) where the original file was destroyed and a client wants to order a 20 x 30 print. UGH. What I am REALLY looking for is someone who understands Alien Skin BU enough to know if the corrections are decent or not. I’m willing to pay someone to resize / rework the photo as much as possible. Is this realistic? Did I mention I’m in a hurry?

    Thanks.

    Maris

  4. Hi Maris. You never mentioned the size of the image, apart from the resolution. If, for instance, it’s very, very small, you could be talking about an 800 or 900% increase. If the photo is super sharp, you can still get a viewable picture, though it will be quite soft, at best. If it’s grainy, or soft, to begin with, it’ll just get worse. The larger, and better quality, the original image is, the better chance you have to get a decent enlargement. I could certainly have a look at it for you, to see what would be possible. Send the image to me at cpr @ landailyn.com (minus spaces, of course) if you’d like. By the way, I’ve pretty much given up Alien BU altogether in favor of Photozoom!

  5. Hi Janine! Thank you for this fantastic retrospective – it is exactly what I was looking for, and really, really helpful :o) I trialled BU recently and was very, very impressed with the results, but on the basis of your comparisons here I will give PhotoZoom a test run before splashing out my hard-earned cash! ;o) Thanks again, Jay

  6. Please do look into PhotoZoom! I’m, frankly, a little in love with all the algorithms and the way I can compare them, one by one, to see the best result! I’m more impressed with it now than I was when I wrote this!

  7. Hi, Janine.

    Thanks for the article, which is very informative and interesting.

    I have a Question on Perfect Resize 7.
    I actually installed the Trial version of Genuine Fractals 5.0.4
    on my Laptop which Resized my images to almost 100% accuracy;
    then found out my Friend had Perfect Resize 7 on her Computer which she let me use. Resize 7 was too high a version for my Laptop and couldn’t work on it.

    The thing is… the Resizing with Perfect Resize 7 was disappointingly soft and unsharp/uncrisp. It was totally far off from being ‘Perfect’, as the name suggests.

    Would u have any suggestions?

    Thank you.

  8. Opps, sorry; someone was rushing me to use the computer, and had left out mentioning that:
    I had already Tweaked the Sliders in the Texture and various other Panes, but nothing seems to work.

  9. I want to thank you for having done this comparison, even so long ago, and for having left it up. Also an oldschool GenuineFractals owner, I balked when they told me a few days back that they no longer offer upgrades for the standalone of Perfect Resize. I’ve been testing out PhotoZoom — and its flexibility, combined with its ability to run standalone and even to easily batch process in standalone mode (!), has made it the one I’m going to switch up to. Shortsightedness has lost Perfect Resize another very longstanding customer, so I hope PhotoZoom keeps up the good work for years to come.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*