<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 5 min Photoshop Retouch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tipsquirrel.com/index.php/2010/07/the-5-min-photoshop-retouch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tipsquirrel.com/index.php/2010/07/the-5-min-photoshop-retouch/</link>
	<description>Nuts About Photoshop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: andie</title>
		<link>http://www.tipsquirrel.com/index.php/2010/07/the-5-min-photoshop-retouch/comment-page-1/#comment-4619</link>
		<dc:creator>andie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 23:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipsquirrel.com/?p=5249#comment-4619</guid>
		<description>the cool thing about photoshop are there are 5billion ways to do the same task.  Thanks for sharing yours!
I wanted to show how quick you can do a quick retouch to snapshots without any extra plug in.s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the cool thing about photoshop are there are 5billion ways to do the same task.  Thanks for sharing yours!<br />
I wanted to show how quick you can do a quick retouch to snapshots without any extra plug in.s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TipSquirrel</title>
		<link>http://www.tipsquirrel.com/index.php/2010/07/the-5-min-photoshop-retouch/comment-page-1/#comment-4601</link>
		<dc:creator>TipSquirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 08:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipsquirrel.com/?p=5249#comment-4601</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul, thanks for your feedback.

Portrait Pro is a clever piece of kit but doesn&#039;t allow for adjustments after the fact like layers do with Photoshop. There&#039;s also the depth of control PS allows. In my opinion, your image looks over done and looks like it has been manipulated, using Andi&#039;s technique the difference is very subtle. Someone once told me, the better you are the less people should know.

Andi says in her intro that this is a technique she uses on snapshots of her friends, not a glamour shoot. I would be very careful using PP on shots of your friends, they may be offended that you thought they needed it.

Finally, Portrait Pro has taken your image as a whole and adjusted the background, which means Andi&#039;s fence is a an odd angle, so more work needs doing to straighten it.

Anyhoo... Like I say, PP is a great piece of software, but I&#039;ll stick to just PS for now :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul, thanks for your feedback.</p>
<p>Portrait Pro is a clever piece of kit but doesn&#8217;t allow for adjustments after the fact like layers do with Photoshop. There&#8217;s also the depth of control PS allows. In my opinion, your image looks over done and looks like it has been manipulated, using Andi&#8217;s technique the difference is very subtle. Someone once told me, the better you are the less people should know.</p>
<p>Andi says in her intro that this is a technique she uses on snapshots of her friends, not a glamour shoot. I would be very careful using PP on shots of your friends, they may be offended that you thought they needed it.</p>
<p>Finally, Portrait Pro has taken your image as a whole and adjusted the background, which means Andi&#8217;s fence is a an odd angle, so more work needs doing to straighten it.</p>
<p>Anyhoo&#8230; Like I say, PP is a great piece of software, but I&#8217;ll stick to just PS for now <img src='http://www.tipsquirrel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Szilard</title>
		<link>http://www.tipsquirrel.com/index.php/2010/07/the-5-min-photoshop-retouch/comment-page-1/#comment-4596</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Szilard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 00:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipsquirrel.com/?p=5249#comment-4596</guid>
		<description>ps: forgive me for the image quality, but it was done with a very low res sample.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps: forgive me for the image quality, but it was done with a very low res sample.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Szilard</title>
		<link>http://www.tipsquirrel.com/index.php/2010/07/the-5-min-photoshop-retouch/comment-page-1/#comment-4594</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Szilard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 00:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipsquirrel.com/?p=5249#comment-4594</guid>
		<description>Hi Andie,
First off, I hope your self criticisms were in jest because your face looks lovely and you should be very happy with it!
Now to business. I took the liberty of saving your &quot;before&quot; shot, and put it through Portrait Professional. Took 7 minutes. You can see the result here: http://remektek.info/tipsquirrel/asmith-tstips-4040-before-200x300_pp.jpg
Email me if you get this, and tell me what you think of the resulting pic.
Have a great day!
-paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andie,<br />
First off, I hope your self criticisms were in jest because your face looks lovely and you should be very happy with it!<br />
Now to business. I took the liberty of saving your &#8220;before&#8221; shot, and put it through Portrait Professional. Took 7 minutes. You can see the result here: <a href="http://remektek.info/tipsquirrel/asmith-tstips-4040-before-200x300_pp.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://remektek.info/tipsquirrel/asmith-tstips-4040-before-200x300_pp.jpg</a><br />
Email me if you get this, and tell me what you think of the resulting pic.<br />
Have a great day!<br />
-paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

