<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom vs Adobe Bridge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tipsquirrel.com/index.php/2010/02/lightroom-vs-adobe-bridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tipsquirrel.com/index.php/2010/02/lightroom-vs-adobe-bridge/</link>
	<description>Nuts About Photoshop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ugg boots on sale</title>
		<link>http://www.tipsquirrel.com/index.php/2010/02/lightroom-vs-adobe-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-12915</link>
		<dc:creator>ugg boots on sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipsquirrel.com/?p=7096#comment-12915</guid>
		<description>I wanted to drop you a quick note to express my thanks. I’ve been following your blog for a month or so and have picked up a ton of good information as well as enjoyed the way you’ve structured your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to drop you a quick note to express my thanks. I’ve been following your blog for a month or so and have picked up a ton of good information as well as enjoyed the way you’ve structured your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Przemek Czaicki</title>
		<link>http://www.tipsquirrel.com/index.php/2010/02/lightroom-vs-adobe-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-11978</link>
		<dc:creator>Przemek Czaicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipsquirrel.com/?p=7096#comment-11978</guid>
		<description>I think the natural progression of applications would be Elements -&gt; Lightroom -&gt; Photoshop.

Lightroom would be addressed to the serious amateur, as it&#039;s a more graphic representation of cameraRAW with a load of presets. From a professional it&#039;s far too limited, especially when you do a lot of pixel level editing.

A lot of photographers use it as a databasing tool though. Personally, I prefer Bridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the natural progression of applications would be Elements -&gt; Lightroom -&gt; Photoshop.</p>
<p>Lightroom would be addressed to the serious amateur, as it&#8217;s a more graphic representation of cameraRAW with a load of presets. From a professional it&#8217;s far too limited, especially when you do a lot of pixel level editing.</p>
<p>A lot of photographers use it as a databasing tool though. Personally, I prefer Bridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heiner kruse</title>
		<link>http://www.tipsquirrel.com/index.php/2010/02/lightroom-vs-adobe-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-11927</link>
		<dc:creator>heiner kruse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tipsquirrel.com/?p=7096#comment-11927</guid>
		<description>A good summary. But Lightroom 3.4.1 does allow to browse thru disks without import, just not as comfortably as Bridge. In Bridge for example, you can easily select if you see the content of a folders subfolders or not, so Bridge is great for Browsing movies for later edits in Premiere. I&#039;ve written a bit more @ www.thegreenman.de</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good summary. But Lightroom 3.4.1 does allow to browse thru disks without import, just not as comfortably as Bridge. In Bridge for example, you can easily select if you see the content of a folders subfolders or not, so Bridge is great for Browsing movies for later edits in Premiere. I&#8217;ve written a bit more @ <a href="http://www.thegreenman.de" rel="nofollow">http://www.thegreenman.de</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

